THE LORD’S SUPPER AS A COVENANT MEAL

THE LORD’S SUPPER AS A COVENANT MEAL
A COMMUNION MEDITATION
By Jack Cottrell

Matthew 26:27-28 – “And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you; for this is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.’” Luke 22:20 – “And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, ‘This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.”

In a recent communion meditation I pointed out how the word “is,” in “This is my blood,” is not literal but figurative. It represents Jesus’s blood. If you still have doubts about interpreting the word “is” this way, I am now going to erase those doubts. On that very same occasion Jesus made another statement where the word (or concept) “is” obviously means “to represent, to stand for.” That was when He said, “This cup which is poured out for you” (obviously meaning the contents of the cup) “IS the new covenant in My blood. This cup IS the new covenant. In what sense was the cup (holding the juice that represents Christ’s blood) a covenant?

I. First, we must ask, what is a covenant? Basically, as the word was used in Bible times, a covenant was much like a contract between two or more persons or parties. It was a mutual promise or pledge; it was a pact or agreement that was officially accepted by both parties. The essence of such a covenant is what each person promises to do. What is Jesus promising to do under this “new covenant” that he mentions in Luke 22:20? Matthew records it thus: “This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins.” The essence of the new covenant, from God’s perspective, is that He promises to forgive your sins! That’s what the blood of Jesus was shed for: it allows God to forgive your sins and still be righteous and just. See Romans 3:24-26.

II. How is this a NEW covenant? Was not God already doing this under the Old Covenant? Was He not forgiving sins in the Old Testament era? Yes, but that was not actually in the terms of the covenant as such, nor did the Old Covenant specifically spell out how God can forgive sins. The promise element of the Old Covenant is contained in Genesis 12:1-7; 15:1-7; 17:1-8; 22:15-18. On these occasions God promised to give Abraham (and through him, to Israel) these things: (1) uncountable descendants; (2) the land of Canaan; and most important (3) “in you all the families of the earth will be blessed” (Genesis 12:3).

Forgiveness of sins was not specifically mentioned in these covenant promises, mainly because God was already forgiving sins of God-fearing individuals before this covenant was made. It was not a new thing that He had to institute here. God indeed continued to forgive the sins of all Israelites who were true believers, because this was something He had always been doing. One thing the Old Covenant made a bit clearer, though, through the animal sacrifices, was that their sins were being forgiven by being placed on a substitute. They did not know, however, Who that true substitute was going to be.

God did promise the Jews that He was planning all along to make a New Covenant with them, as spelled out in Jeremiah 31:31-34. Then when Jesus came, in fulfillment of the Old Covenant promises (especially the third one), He said, in effect, “This is it! This is the New Covenant that Jeremiah promised! And do you want to know what this New Covenant is all about? Here it is: the essence of this New Covenant is the forgiveness of sins! Under this covenant you will not only receive the forgiveness of sins itself (which others before you were already receiving), but you will also receive the knowledge of how this forgiveness is possible! Here you will see the real substitute upon which your sins are being laid, i.e., the one true blood sacrifice! Take this cup and drink from it, because ‘this is the new covenant in My blood.’ This is the real thing: My blood!”

III. What does the covenant have to do with blood? Well, for one thing, the issue here is whether or not you can really trust someone when you enter into an agreement with them. “Do you really mean it? How serious are you? Can I trust you to keep your promises? How can you guarantee you will keep your promises?”

Today, we accomplish this with INK. When a contract has been drawn up, both parties attach their signatures to it with a pen. We sign contracts that are enforceable by law, and even have them notarized.

But in Bible times, and in many other cultures historically, the covenant guarantee was sealed with BLOOD. The blood was a sign of just how serious you were. Sometimes the covenant parties cut their wrists and then grasped each other’s arms so that their blood mingled. In the Old Testament, making a formal covenant involved slaughtering an animal, dividing the carcass in half, and then walking between the pieces saying, “If I do not keep my word, may I be sliced up and fed to the vultures” (see Genesis 15, and Revelation 19:17-18.) This is why they sometimes spoke of “cutting a covenant” (Jeremiah 34:18).

In other words, it was a blood covenant. You were guaranteeing it with your very life, “for the life of the flesh is in the blood” (Leviticus 17:11). It was similar to our childhood promise, “Cross my heart and hope to die; stick a needle in my eye.” I.e., “I guarantee it with my very life.”

This is not the only way the blood of Jesus was the foundation of the New Covenant, but it is one thing Jesus is saying to us when He says that this covenant is “the new covenant in My blood.”

IV. One more point: a covenant is a mutual, two-way agreement, involving promises from both sides—something like a wedding ceremony. In the New Covenant established by Christ’s blood, God’s promise is that He will forgive our sins. (By the way, I am thrilled with this promise! I would much rather have forgiveness of sins than uncountable descendants or even a country all my own.)

But what are we promising to God in that moment when we enter a covenant with Him? We are promising to love and trust and serve Jesus Christ forever! We make that promise when we are preparing to enter the waters of Christian baptism, and in that act the two promises come together.

So what are we doing now, here at the Lord’s table? For one thing, we are renewing our covenant vows to love, trust, and serve Jesus forever. We are remembering God’s promise to us and thanking Him for it, i.e., the forgiveness of our sins made possible by the pouring out of the blood of Jesus. And we are promising Him again to serve Jesus, even if it requires us to give up our lives for Him! Cross my heart and hope to die!

Comments

THE LORD’S SUPPER AS A COVENANT MEAL — 9 Comments

  1. Bro. Cottrell Regarding “open communion” and the Statement of James A. Garfield:
    ” We observe the institution of the Lord’s Supper on every Lord’s Day. To this Table we neither invite nor debar. We say it is the Lord’s Table for all the Lord’s children.” This seems to have been adopted by the Restoration Movement to a certain extent.

    Was Garfield limiting this statement to the church; or was he wrong?

    • We cannot read Garfield’s mind, so we cannot know for sure how he intends for us to understand his statement. My judgment is that he means by the expression “all the Lord’s children” those who are part of His church. By saying “we neither invite nor debar,” I think he means that each person has to examine himself or herself as to the genuineness of his or her faith; the rest of us are not in a position to do that. What we leaders ARE responsible for doing, though, is making sure that the audience understands the basic meaning of the Supper, and understands that it is meant only for Christians.

  2. Jack, my son is a member of a Church of Christ that observes the Lord’s Supper and the Elders often refer to it as “time to take the crackers and juice”. My son, who has done a lot of mission work and has suffered a lot in his life says this term, “crackers and juice” is disrespectful and he is greatly disturbed by it. He talked the Elders about it and their answer is, “well, thats what it is, crackers and juice! What do you think of this? My son says it is not respected or revered to speak of it in this way before partaking.

    • If that is the ONLY thing the elders say about it, I think he has a point. Thus I would advise the elders to be more sensitive to his concerns and not just try to defend themselves. Also, I would advise you son not to make a big crusade of this. I doubt if the elders were intended to show disrespect by using this language, but they can probably find a happy medium.

  3. Bro Jack, bring that is it the new covenant, who is eligible to partake in it? The practice of so-called ‘open table’ communion has diluted this sacred practice into a self-meditative exercise it seems.

    • Partaking of the Lord’s Supper has meaning only for Christians. It is not intended for anyone else. It is not intended for children and spectators, though it is good for these categories to observe what is happening. If some of them do not understand, and partake anyway, I will not make a fuss about it. It is not going to hurt them. Christian parents should know not to allow their unbaptized children to partake. The “open communion” idea is legitimate in the sense that if you are a baptized believer, you may partake even if you are not a member of this congregation. Many groups that have practiced or still practice “closed communion” limit participation only to members of the local congregation.

  4. The part of the covenant we often forget about – conveniently I might add – is the necessity of obedience to His commands.

    • That is part of what we are committing ourselves to when we enter into this covenant relationship with God.

  5. The Lord’s Supper isn’t the time for Christians to beg God for forgiveness, as so many people believe, it is an individual’s opportunity to thank God for having forgiven them. The time of communion wasn’t designed to be a type of confessional, as our catholic friends believe.