HomeGeneralTHE LORD’S SUPPER AS A COVENANT MEAL

Comments

THE LORD’S SUPPER AS A COVENANT MEAL — 9 Comments

  1. Bro. Cottrell Regarding “open communion” and the Statement of James A. Garfield:
    ” We observe the institution of the Lord’s Supper on every Lord’s Day. To this Table we neither invite nor debar. We say it is the Lord’s Table for all the Lord’s children.” This seems to have been adopted by the Restoration Movement to a certain extent.

    Was Garfield limiting this statement to the church; or was he wrong?

    • We cannot read Garfield’s mind, so we cannot know for sure how he intends for us to understand his statement. My judgment is that he means by the expression “all the Lord’s children” those who are part of His church. By saying “we neither invite nor debar,” I think he means that each person has to examine himself or herself as to the genuineness of his or her faith; the rest of us are not in a position to do that. What we leaders ARE responsible for doing, though, is making sure that the audience understands the basic meaning of the Supper, and understands that it is meant only for Christians.

  2. Jack, my son is a member of a Church of Christ that observes the Lord’s Supper and the Elders often refer to it as “time to take the crackers and juice”. My son, who has done a lot of mission work and has suffered a lot in his life says this term, “crackers and juice” is disrespectful and he is greatly disturbed by it. He talked the Elders about it and their answer is, “well, thats what it is, crackers and juice! What do you think of this? My son says it is not respected or revered to speak of it in this way before partaking.

    • If that is the ONLY thing the elders say about it, I think he has a point. Thus I would advise the elders to be more sensitive to his concerns and not just try to defend themselves. Also, I would advise you son not to make a big crusade of this. I doubt if the elders were intended to show disrespect by using this language, but they can probably find a happy medium.

  3. Bro Jack, bring that is it the new covenant, who is eligible to partake in it? The practice of so-called ‘open table’ communion has diluted this sacred practice into a self-meditative exercise it seems.

    • Partaking of the Lord’s Supper has meaning only for Christians. It is not intended for anyone else. It is not intended for children and spectators, though it is good for these categories to observe what is happening. If some of them do not understand, and partake anyway, I will not make a fuss about it. It is not going to hurt them. Christian parents should know not to allow their unbaptized children to partake. The “open communion” idea is legitimate in the sense that if you are a baptized believer, you may partake even if you are not a member of this congregation. Many groups that have practiced or still practice “closed communion” limit participation only to members of the local congregation.

  4. The part of the covenant we often forget about – conveniently I might add – is the necessity of obedience to His commands.

    • That is part of what we are committing ourselves to when we enter into this covenant relationship with God.

  5. The Lord’s Supper isn’t the time for Christians to beg God for forgiveness, as so many people believe, it is an individual’s opportunity to thank God for having forgiven them. The time of communion wasn’t designed to be a type of confessional, as our catholic friends believe.