HomeNotesShould the Emblems of the Lord’s Supper Be Taken by Christians Only?

Comments

Should the Emblems of the Lord’s Supper Be Taken by Christians Only? — 3 Comments

  1. Wonderful article! I have a question. I have been a Christian for many years and should probably know the answer to this question, but it’s cloudy and I need some clarity. My question is, explain the difference between breaking bread and eating, and breaking bread and having communion? It seems breaking bread means two different things to me I.e. eating and taking communion. I appreciate your assistance with this question.

    • In the days of Jesus and of the early church this phrase, “breaking bread” referred to ordinary meals (e.g., Matthew 14:19; Luke 24:35; Acts 2:46) and in this sense was not a religious or church ceremony. But it also came to be used of the Lord’s Supper. My judgment on this is that in the early church, the Lord’s Supper was always somehow INCLUDED as part of a regular meal (on the Lord’s Day, Acts 20:7); therefore the phrase “breaking of bread” also came to be used specifically for the Lord’s Supper as a Christian or church ceremony, whether included with a regular mea1 or not. So you are right: the phrase can mean either one. The Biblical context will dictate when it is referring to the Lord’s Supper. I.e., when it is being described as a CHURCH PRACTICE, it is most likely the Lord’s Supper (i.e., Acts 2:42; 20:7; 1 Cor. 10:16-17).