HomeGeneralWhy Do Some Call It the “Eucharist”? A Communion Meditation

Comments

Why Do Some Call It the “Eucharist”? A Communion Meditation — 6 Comments

  1. I am praying the Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius. As I a protestant, I was curious why Catholics always call it the “Eucharist,” and we call it “Communion.” This answered my question! Thank you so much!

  2. I am giving many thanks to you and your insights in the Word. This year my husband and I have not been able to go to worship many tines because of Indiana weather and poor health. We have used your communion meditations for our home worship with study and the emblems. We have always been active in our church body and at 84 things change. May you be blessed for the for the work you have put into the study of God’s Word. Lee and Kay Strang

    • No, the context of Matthew 18:20 has nothing to do with communion (or small group prayer, as it’s often applied).

  3. Since you brought up this “strange term” (i.e., Eucharist) that is typically not used in our Restoration Movement tribes, I thought I would point out something that the Roman Catholics also believe about the Eucharist. As you are probably well aware, the Roman Catholics believe in the concept of transubstantiation where the bread and wine literally become the body and blood of Jesus. Now, while I certainly would not agree with this position, I cannot help but believe that there might be something to this in at least a spiritual sense. That is, could it be that the Lord is somehow present in some fuller sense whenever the Church partakes of the Eucharist than he is at any other moment? The travelers on the road to Emmaus, for example, did not recognize the risen Lord until that moment when he was revealed during the breaking of bread.

    Reference: Luke 24:30-31 (ESV) “When he was at table with them, he took the bread and blessed and broke it and gave it to them. 31 And their eyes were opened, and they recognized him.”

    Bottom Line: Through the eyes of faith, I think it might be okay to reflect on the possibility that something more could be going on during the Lord’s Supper. I think of it as a moment in time where the eternal penetrates into the here and now in a more concentrated way, if that makes any sense. At any rate, I would be curious as to your thoughts.

    • This suggestion, which moves toward the view of Martin Luther, does not pose a threat of any kind and attempts to add to the proper meaning of the Lord’s Supper, but I do not see any Biblical teaching that would provide a basis or foundation for it. The Luke 24:30-31 incident has nothing to do with the Lord’s Supper, I think.