HomeGeneralA WORLD LIKE THIS

Comments

A WORLD LIKE THIS — 5 Comments

  1. Thank you Dr. Cottrell for your insight, reminds me of the old hymn ” This world is not my home.” Blaming God started back in the third chapter of Genesis and continues on too this day.

  2. Dr. Cottrell, thanks for you post on this topic. As a Christ-follower, your explanation is encouraging and helpful. I have a question though, that is related, but needs a slightly different answer…

    My wife has a professor who is an atheist [read: outspoken and sometimes condescending] and used the logic “If God is loving, why did he let this happen?”, “If God is all knowing, why didn’t he do something to prevent it since he knew it was coming?”, and “If God is all powerful, why didn’t he stop it?” Concluding that God can only have, at most, two of those characteristics otherwise the tornado wouldn’t have happened.

    My question is, how should one respond to this? I’m sure there is something that he is assuming in his logic that I’m not picking up on, and he also obviously assuming that his thinking/knowledge is how God is thinking. But as my wife and I talked through it, I couldn’t come to the conclusion that I felt was a proper response to his comments.

    Thanks for your help!

    • The answer to this kind of question ultimately begins with God’s decision to create a world with free-will beings. Because God is sovereign, we must accept the fact that he did not have to create such beings, but wanted to do so and thus made the decision to do so. Because God is omniscient, we must also accept the fact that he knew all the possible variables that could come into existence as the result of free-will choices. Because God is totally self-consistent, we must also conclude that once he has made his decision to make such beings, he will allow them to use their free will even if the resulting choices are evil and result in evil. Otherwise the whole point of making free-will beings would be self-contradictory. This applies to the situation I discussed in my essay, i.e., that fact that this world includes many “natural” evils as the result of Adam’s fall. This presupposes the making of Adam and Eve with free will, and allowing them to choose between good and evil even if they opted for the latter. This same pattern of reasoning would apply to any question with the form, “Why did God allow this evil thing to happen?” The question that is most difficult is this: why did God choose to make free-will beings in the first place, knowing the possible outcomes? What is so important about free will that God was willing to risk the rise of countless tragic situations? The answer, I think, may seem contradictory; but I believe the answer is love. Without free will, there could be no love. Only creatures with free will could choose to love their Creator with a true love. This is apparently the highest priority for God; see, for example, Jesus’ teaching that our love for God is what God wants from us more than anything else (Matthew 22:37-38). My original book on What the Bible Says About God the Ruler has a chapter on “The Problem of Evil,” in which I discuss this whole issue. Therein I say, “If man is to have the ability freely to choose to love God, he must also be given the capacity to choose to hate and reject God. Thus in a sense the creation of free-will beings entailed a risk. But God was willing to risk the free choice of evil in order to have freely-chosen love and worship” (p. 398).

  3. Thank you, Jack, for writing this. I needed this today. So sorry for the loss of life and destruction in Oklahoma City.

  4. Dr Cottrell, thanks for the good words and the good insight into the Word of God.